From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35829 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpuXm-0001uX-Pg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:28:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpuXl-0004OZ-NB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:28:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpuXl-0004OI-G0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:28:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:15:38 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20110217031538.GA22552@amt.cnet> References: <20110215175410.GA13487@amt.cnet> <4D5ACCED.1080906@siemens.com> <20110215200446.GA15802@amt.cnet> <4D5AE2FC.4020309@web.de> <20110215205504.GA16527@amt.cnet> <20110215205631.GA16579@amt.cnet> <4D5B99A9.1010404@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D5B99A9.1010404@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] fix halt emulation with icount and CONFIG_IOTHREAD (v2) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Jan Kiszka , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:32:25AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 02/15/2011 09:56 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > >Note: to be applied to uq/master. > > > >In icount mode, halt emulation should take into account the nearest > >event when sleeping. > > I agree with Jan that this patch is not the best solution, if not incorrect. > > However, in the iothread, the main loop can kick the VCPU thread > instead of running cpu_exec_all like it does in non-iothread mode. > Something like this: > > diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c > index b436952..7835317 100644 > --- a/vl.c > +++ b/vl.c > @@ -1425,7 +1425,9 @@ static void main_loop(void) > qemu_main_loop_start(); > > for (;;) { > -#ifndef CONFIG_IOTHREAD > +#ifdef CONFIG_IOTHREAD > + qemu_cpu_kick(first_cpu); > +#else > nonblocking = cpu_exec_all(); > if (vm_request_pending()) { > nonblocking = true; > > I don't like this 100% because it relies on the fact that there is > only one TCG execution thread. In a multithreaded world you would: > > 1) have each CPU register its own instruction counter; > > 2) have each CPU register its own QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME timer based on > qemu_icount_delta() and arm it just before going to sleep; the timer > kicks the CPU. > > 3) remove all icount business from qemu_calculate_timeout. > > Item (3) is what makes me prefer my patch above (if it works) to > Marcelo's. Marcelo's patch is tying even more > qemu_calculate_timeout to the icount. So if anything, a patch > tweaking the timedwait like Marcelo's should use something based on > qemu_icount_delta(). Yes, using qemu_icount_delta directly in tcg_wait_io_event timedwait is explicit (partially the reason for confusion with my patch). So the reasoning for the patch is: With icount vm_timer timers expire on virtual CPU time. If a CPU halts, you cannot expect passage of realtime to trigger vm_timers expiration. So instead vm_timer expiration is converted to realtime, and used as halt timeout.