From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36430 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Prs0P-0002vl-5q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:10:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1Prs0I-0004sp-Hk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:10:11 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35869)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1Prs0I-0004si-5k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:10:10 -0500
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:10:03 -0300
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Agenda for Feb 22
Message-ID: <20110222101003.58978b67@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <4D62C750.1090802@codemonkey.ws>
References: <m3zkppia6v.fsf@trasno.org>
	<4D62C750.1090802@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, quintela@redhat.com

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:13:04 -0600
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:

> On 02/21/2011 11:12 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >    
> 
>   - 0.14.0 release is out, thanks to everyone that participated!  Let's 
> discuss what worked well, what could be improved.
>   - 0.15 planning
>   - Should we do a bump to 1.0?

Maybe we should wait for QAPI?

>   - Probably should have a placeholder for something like "criteria for 
> block format acceptance"

- GSoC projects

  We have only three projects so far, not sure what the impact is, but I think
  we need more. Also note that Google beings accepting mentoring organizations
  applications on February, 28.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 
> > thanks, Juan.
> >
> >    
> 
>