From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34977 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Purwi-0006Nu-2W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:42:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Purwg-0007DI-Pg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:42:51 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Purwg-0007Cu-Fn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:42:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:36:34 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20110302193634.GB22743@amt.cnet> References: <1298884224-19734-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4D6B67E0.4040408@redhat.com> <4D6B7479.5010307@redhat.com> <4D6B8D92.8050807@siemens.com> <4D6B9154.6000601@redhat.com> <4D6BAB8C.4040508@redhat.com> <4D6CE82C.3030702@redhat.com> <20110302184309.GA21289@amt.cnet> <4D6E948E.4050207@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D6E948E.4050207@siemens.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 uq/master 00/22] Win32 iothread support List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "blauwirbel@gmail.com" , Avi Kivity , Paolo Bonzini , "aurelien@aurel32.net" On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:03:42PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-03-02 19:43, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 02/28/2011 04:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>> On 02/28/2011 01:13 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> If there's a git tree of this I'll be happy to do an autotest run. > >>> > >>> Sure, it's branch iothread-win32 of git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git > >> > >> Fails on Fedora 9 i386 install, hangs right after "Performing post > >> install configuration...". The guest is processing interrupts but > >> the mouse won't move, and it doesn't make progress. > >> > >> Configured with --enable-io-thread. Perhaps the problem exists even > >> before the patchset. > > > > Probably unrelated, looks similar to the regression seen with qemu-kvm. > > > > Do these patches change some behavior or not? Yes, they change some behaviour. Autotest fails. > Is it this same effect you saw with my qemu-kvm queue? Yes.