From: Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
xming <xmingske@gmail.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 12:30:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110306103059.GL3222@playa.tlv.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110305163558.GA4607@amt.cnet>
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 01:35:58PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > at /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-kvm-0.14.0/work/qemu-kvm-0.14.0/qemu-kvm.c:1466
> > > #12 0x00007ffff77bb944 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> > > #13 0x00007ffff5e491dd in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > > (gdb)
> >
> > That's a spice bug. In fact, there are a lot of
> > qemu_mutex_lock/unlock_iothread in that subsystem. I bet at least a few
> > of them can cause even more subtle problems.
> >
> > Two general issues with dropping the global mutex like this:
> > - The caller of mutex_unlock is responsible for maintaining
> > cpu_single_env across the unlocked phase (that's related to the
> > abort above).
> > - Dropping the lock in the middle of a callback is risky. That may
> > enable re-entrances of code sections that weren't designed for this
> > (I'm skeptic about the side effects of
> > qemu_spice_vm_change_state_handler - why dropping the lock here?).
> >
> > Spice requires a careful review regarding such issues. Or it should
> > pioneer with introducing its own lock so that we can handle at least
> > related I/O activities over the VCPUs without holding the global mutex
> > (but I bet it's not the simplest candidate for such a new scheme).
> >
> > Jan
> >
>
> Agree with the concern regarding spice.
>
What are the pros and cons of (re)introducing a spice specific lock?
+ simplicity. Only spice touches the spice lock.
- ? what were the original reasons for Gerd dropping the spice lock?
I have no problem reintroducing this lock, I'm just concerned that it's
wasted effort because after I send that patch someone will jump and remind
me why it was removed in the first place.
> Regarding global mutex, TCG and KVM execution behaviour can become more
> similar wrt locking by dropping qemu_global_mutex during generation and
> execution of TBs.
>
> Of course for memory or PIO accesses from vcpu context qemu_global_mutex
> must be acquired.
>
> With that in place, it becomes easier to justify further improvements
> regarding parallelization, such as using a read-write lock for
> l1_phys_map / phys_page_find_alloc.
>
>
> 21.62% sh 3d38920b3f [.] 0x00003d38920b3f
> 6.38% sh qemu-system-x86_64 [.] phys_page_find_alloc
> 4.90% sh qemu-system-x86_64 [.] tb_find_fast
> 4.34% sh qemu-system-x86_64 [.] tlb_flush
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-06 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AANLkTint9-P-1jD5pbXstzPcYueLHQ68Rd0T_Chz6xRN@mail.gmail.com>
2011-02-26 12:29 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl Jan Kiszka
2011-02-26 14:44 ` xming
2011-02-27 19:03 ` Alon Levy
2011-02-27 19:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-27 19:16 ` Alon Levy
2011-02-27 19:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-27 19:29 ` Alon Levy
2011-02-27 19:32 ` Alon Levy
2011-03-01 12:58 ` Alon Levy
2011-03-02 8:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-03-02 10:56 ` Alon Levy
2011-03-02 11:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-03-02 12:32 ` Alon Levy
2011-02-28 12:56 ` xming
2011-03-01 3:56 ` Rick Vernam
2011-03-05 16:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-03-05 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-03-06 10:30 ` Alon Levy [this message]
2011-03-07 16:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-03-06 10:38 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-07 16:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-03-07 22:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-03-08 9:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-08 9:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-03-08 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-26 8:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2011-04-26 9:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-26 9:43 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-04-26 9:34 ` Alon Levy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110306103059.GL3222@playa.tlv.redhat.com \
--to=alevy@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xmingske@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).