From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48890 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzDHv-0003RR-JS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:18:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1PzDHp-0002se-Q5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:18:38 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15769)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1PzDHp-0002sU-9c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:18:37 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:18:34 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Upgrading Seabios to 0.6.2
Message-ID: <20110314191833.GC15825@redhat.com>
References: <20110308115327.GC2504@redhat.com> <4D7635A8.1040206@codemonkey.ws>
	<20110308140232.GD2504@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110308140232.GD2504@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:02:32PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:56:56AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 03/08/2011 05:53 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > >Seabios 0.6.2 is finally released. What about upgrading QEMU to it and
> > >also applying this http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/81099/?
> > 
> > Should we just move to the latest git?  I don't mind tracking git
> > during development provided that we land on a stable release by the
> > time we release.
> > 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> > It just requires someone to do a little smoke testing on the
> > particular git snapshots to make sure things aren't horribly
> > regressing.
> > 
> I often run guests with latest seabios git, not sure it can count as
> smoke testing. But since we will do it in development tree only, if
> something breaks we will fix it. That is what development tree is for :)
> Better to catch breakage earlier than later.
> 
Any news about this?

--
			Gleb.