From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59190 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzLDi-0002oD-BR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:46:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzLDh-00011K-AH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:46:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzLDg-00011F-WB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:46:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:38:20 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20110315033820.GA16259@amt.cnet> References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain> <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com> <4D766415.2090702@redhat.com> <4D766583.9040507@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D766583.9040507@siemens.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Chris Wright , Paolo Bonzini , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Avi Kivity On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:21:07PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>> The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a > >>> regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? > >> > >> Can't follow. What do you mean? > > > > I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test > > definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread. > > What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm. > > Are we talking about the failing Fedora installations? Or something else? > > Jan The failing Fedora installation problem is gone.