From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40833 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pzx71-0007LR-GY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:14:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1Pzx70-000456-2A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:14:31 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20530)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1Pzx6z-00044u-Pq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:14:30 -0400
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:13:31 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20110316201331.GA27644@amt.cnet>
References: <cover.1300225848.git.mtosatti@redhat.com>
	<f06197008087c5fa592f65a96f46d7f00dddb1cd.1300225848.git.mtosatti@redhat.com>
	<4D807C9A.3060205@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D807C9A.3060205@siemens.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 21/35] Break up user and system
 cpu_interrupt implementations
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:02:18AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-03-15 22:50, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> > 
> > Both have only two lines in common, and we will convert the system
> > service into a callback which is of no use for user mode operation.
> 
> >From KVM POV, the value of this patch is not that high as long as we do
> not push the callback patches as well.

Agreed, patch removed from queue.