From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52621 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q05ny-0005Hz-Fk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:31:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Q05nx-0007bB-5M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:31:26 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53817)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Q05nw-0007b4-SB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:31:25 -0400
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:31:13 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 07/26] pci/p2pbr: generic pci p2p bridge
Message-ID: <20110317053113.GG32049@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1300266238.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<392c8eaaeb8f0729ab39b261d0dda21208c05ea6.1300266238.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<20110316213441.GA32049@redhat.com>
	<20110317020851.GG16841@valinux.co.jp>
	<20110317051718.GE32049@redhat.com>
	<20110317052624.GJ16841@valinux.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110317052624.GJ16841@valinux.co.jp>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:26:24PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 07:17:18AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Anyway this patch isn't very critical. I think the available choice is
> > > 
> > > - this patch
> > > - modify the patch to use 14 arguments function.
> > >   Thus we can save much more lines.
> > > - Add one more p2p bridge code which q35 uses, accepting same code which
> > >   differs only in IDs.
> > > - any other ideas?
> > > 
> > > Which option do you prefer?
> > 
> > Add one more bridge for q35.
> 
> Okay.
> How about other pci related patches? I think they are trivial.

I'll look at the usage to see how good new APIs are.

> -- 
> yamahata