From: Clemens Kolbitsch <ck@iseclab.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Relative/Absolute timing snapshot problem
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:39:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201103181339.33709.ck@iseclab.org> (raw)
Hi list,
strange situation: When I create a snapshot using Qemu 0.14.0 stable,
everything works smoothly and resuming the CPU takes about 1-2 seconds. If I
don't use the snapshot file for some time, the time it takes to resume grows
by 2-3 seconds per day. At the moment, I'm looking at a snapshot file from
last week and it takes nearly 30 seconds to load.
Funny thing about it: if I turn my system time back to the date when the
snapshot was created (or before that), resuming CPU works within the expected
1-2 seconds. I have _very briefly_ looked into it and it seems like Qemu
spends an aweful long amount of time catching up with timer execution -- is it
possible that these are stored using absolute time instead of relative timing?
I am using qcow2 file format, because I absolutely rely on CPU-snapshots and
support for base-files. I have read here and there that it is more or less
broken (or at least very slow), but with the correct cache-options it works
for me (except for this bug, of course).
Has anyone encountered this or should I start looking into it (although I have
some experience with the core source, I'm not very experienced with the
snapshotting code).
Thanks,
Clemens
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-26 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-18 20:39 Clemens Kolbitsch [this message]
2011-03-28 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] Relative/Absolute timing snapshot problem Jes Sorensen
2011-03-28 16:25 ` Clemens Kolbitsch
2011-03-28 16:32 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-03-28 17:49 ` Blue Swirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201103181339.33709.ck@iseclab.org \
--to=ck@iseclab.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).