From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34669 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4AiE-0006mM-HX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:34:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4AiD-0002fE-6R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:34:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4AiC-0002f9-QT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:34:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:34:02 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20110328113402.GA25451@redhat.com> References: <20110327145629.GA7913@redhat.com> <20110328111956.GF16639@valinux.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110328111956.GF16639@valinux.co.jp> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] piix_pci: optimize irq data path List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Isaku Yamahata Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:19:56PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 04:56:29PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:17:19AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > > > v4 has minor typo. I sent it too early. Here's fixed one. > > > > > > v3 -> v4 Main changes are > > > - use pirq, pci_intx instead of irq_num in piix_pci.c > > > - patch 4/4 cleans the code a bit > > > > With this applied e1000 fails to work for me. > > Command line: > > > > qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -m 1G -drive > > if=virtio,file=/home/mst/rhel6.qcow2 -netdev user,id=bar -net > > nic,netdev=bar,model=e1000,macaddr=52:54:00:12:34:57 -redir > > tcp:8022::22 -net nic,model=e1000,netdev=foo,macaddr=52:54:00:12:34:56 > > -netdev > > tap,id=foo,ifname=msttap0,script=/home/mst/ifup,downscript=no > > -nographic > > > > Could you try that please? > > Does the following patch help? Seems to help, but I have to ask - how did you test v5? > If so, I'll prepare v6. > > diff --git a/hw/piix_pci.c b/hw/piix_pci.c > index c019793..5f0d92f 100644 > --- a/hw/piix_pci.c > +++ b/hw/piix_pci.c > @@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static void piix3_set_irq_pic(PIIX3State *piix3, int pic_irq) > { > qemu_set_irq(piix3->pic[pic_irq], > !!(piix3->pic_levels & > - ((PIIX_NUM_PIRQS - 1) << (pic_irq * PIIX_NUM_PIRQS)))); > + (((1UL << PIIX_NUM_PIRQS) - 1) << > + (pic_irq * PIIX_NUM_PIRQS)))); I think we should just make it ~0ULL << (pic_irq * PIIX_NUM_PIRQS). Didn't try this though. > } > > static void piix3_set_irq_level(PIIX3State *piix3, int pirq, int level) > > -- > yamahata