From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43400 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q50Hp-0008Jo-1f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:38:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q50Hn-0001qc-Oj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:38:32 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100]:34781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q50Hn-0001qH-9M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:38:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:38:27 -0700 From: Nathan Froyd Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] target-arm: Make Neon helper routines use correct FP status Message-ID: <20110330183827.GH23480@codesourcery.com> References: <1299867146-22049-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <1299867146-22049-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <20110311183057.GV23686@codesourcery.com> <20110314053558.GA30619@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:15:08PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 14 March 2011 05:35, Nathan Froyd wrote: > > Oh, right.  I am ambivalent as to whether passing env to such functions > > is the right thing to do or not. > > So did this amount to a request for a change to this patchset, > or are you happy to let it pass? I am happy to let it pass. -Nathan