Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3] report that QEMU process was killed by a signal

[Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:49:10PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 01:39 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >On 15 March 2011 11:56, Gleb Natapov<gleb@redhat.com>  wrote:
> >>Currently when rogue script kills QEMU process (using TERM/INT/HUP
> >>signal) it looks indistinguishable from system shutdown. Lets report
> >>that QEMU was killed and leave some clues about the killer identity.
> >Unfortunately this patch causes qemu to segfault when killed
> >via ^C (at least on my Ubuntu maverick system). This is because
> >it registers a signal handler with sigaction, but then later
> >the SDL library is initialised and it reinstalls our handler
> >with plain old signal:
> >
> >         ohandler = signal(SIGINT, SDL_HandleSIG);
> >         if ( ohandler != SIG_DFL )
> >                 signal(SIGINT, ohandler);
> >
> >This is clearly buggy but on the other hand SDL is pretty widely
> >deployed and it's the default QEMU video output method, so I think
> >we need to work around it :-(
> >
> >The most straightforward fix is to get the signal number from
> >argument one and not to bother printing the PID that killed us.
> 
> Or just #ifdefing this to 0 for now and then once an SDL version is
> released that works correctly, adding an appropriate guard.
> 
I prefer to move signal init after SDL init.

--
			Gleb.