From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47262 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q72gq-0006RQ-Fz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:36:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1Q72gp-0002cD-EQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:36:48 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59319)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1Q72gp-0002bz-16
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:36:47 -0400
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:36:36 +0300
From: Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for April 05
Message-ID: <20110405093636.GA8723@playa.tlv.redhat.com>
References: <m38vvpom86.fsf@neno.mitica>
 <4D9A231F.6040004@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D9A231F.6040004@codemonkey.ws>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "lmr@redhat.com" <lmr@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, quintela@redhat.com, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:59:27PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 02:22 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >Please, send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> 
> - KVM Forum -- do we have an ETA on CFP?
> 
> - Sub-maintainership -- how we can expand and improve upon it
> 
> - Trivial patch monkeys^Wteam -- this is an idea Stefan and I have
> been kicking around to help some of the trivial patches get more
> attention on the mailing list
> 
> - kvm-autotest -- I don't know if Lucas can join, but I'd like to
> get an update on what the future plans around kvm-autotest is and
> also have a discussion about what folks would like to see improved.

I'd like to join to hear that. Support for doing remote client tests
with kvm-autotest would be very interesting (i.e. spice).

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 
> >Later, Juan.
> >
> >
> 
>