From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Khoa Huynh <khoa@us.ibm.com>,
pbadari@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] raw-posix: Linearize direct I/O on Linux NFS
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:05:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110416020516.GB11264@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA8D5DF.5070503@us.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:33:51PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> To be honest with you, we should kill cache=none and just optimize only one
> case and live with it (like other commerical
> hypervisor). :(
cache=none is the only sane mode for qemu, modulo bugs in nfs or similar weird
protocols that no sane person should use for VM storage.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-16 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-15 13:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] raw-posix: Linearize direct I/O on Linux NFS Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-15 15:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 15:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-15 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 16:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-15 16:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-15 17:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 16:23 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-04-15 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 22:21 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-04-15 23:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-15 23:33 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-04-16 2:05 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-04-16 8:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-16 2:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 18:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-15 18:25 ` Badari Pulavarty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110416020516.GB11264@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=khoa@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbadari@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).