From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57048)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bradh@frogmouth.net>) id 1QAtMT-0001Jo-3L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:27:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bradh@frogmouth.net>) id 1QAtMR-0000ao-Lf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:27:41 -0400
Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.129]:34661)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bradh@frogmouth.net>) id 1QAtMR-0000aD-Al
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:27:39 -0400
From: Brad Hards <bradh@frogmouth.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 10:27:29 +1000
References: <C9CE0E24.B9B3%Stuart.Ritchie@tellabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <C9CE0E24.B9B3%Stuart.Ritchie@tellabs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201104161027.29234.bradh@frogmouth.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Para-virtualized ram-based filesystem?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Saturday 16 April 2011 09:58:32 Ritchie, Stuart wrote:
> How does that sound?
As a general user: Confusing.

Is there a concrete example (specific applications, specific performance issues, 
specific requirements) that you can share?

Brad