From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBous-00083h-9Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:55:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBoun-0005Fi-US for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:55:02 -0400 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.126.93]:39273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBoun-0005Fc-Ly for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:54:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:54:55 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno Message-ID: <20110418135455.GP10979@hall.aurel32.net> References: <1302881578-5357-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20110418121926.GA3387@afflict.kos.to> <201104181521.54646.dl9pf@gmx.de> <20110418133650.GO10979@hall.aurel32.net> <40E2D5CC-201E-4711-8EA5-CE3CC352CF6A@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <40E2D5CC-201E-4711-8EA5-CE3CC352CF6A@suse.de> Sender: Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/17] s390x: s390x-linux-user support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Riku Voipio , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jan-Simon =?iso-8859-15?Q?M=F6ller?= , Richard Henderson On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 18.04.2011, at 15:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Jan-Simon Möller wrote: > >> Am Montag, 18. April 2011, 14:19:26 schrieb Riku Voipio: > >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:06:02PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > >>>>> The patch looks OK, but I'd like to have a try with some s390x static > >>>>> binaries. Such binaries are also useful for me to test that new patches > >>>>> for linxu-user don't break targets I don't usually use. > >>>> > >>>> Sure - what exactly would you like there? I can easily compile a few. Do > >>>> you want to have them added to the tests/ directory? > >>> > >>> busybox has so far been most useful. > >>> > >> > >> Good idea, what about adding a collection of static busybox for the different > >> arches? Not everyone testing has the compiler around for $ARCH . > >> > > > > It's something that already exists [1]. It would actually make sense to > > add s390x binaries there. Also it might be a good idea to provide a > > minimal system image as on other architectures. > > > > [1] http://wiki.qemu.org/Download > > I find the minimal systems rather useless, but love your Debian images. So if you could create one of those for s390, that'd be awesome! :) > Once I get qemu-system-s390x fully working, it looks my scripts to produce images should work with minor changes for s390. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net