From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] ide/atapi: Use table instead of switch for commands
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:44:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110425101437.GC8308@amit-x200.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303299015-11036-4-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
On (Wed) 20 Apr 2011 [13:30:13], Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/ide/atapi.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ide/atapi.c b/hw/ide/atapi.c
> index d161bf7..d0bf7fd 100644
> --- a/hw/ide/atapi.c
> +++ b/hw/ide/atapi.c
> @@ -533,10 +533,11 @@ static unsigned int event_status_media(IDEState *s,
> return 8; /* We wrote to 4 extra bytes from the header */
> }
>
> -static void handle_get_event_status_notification(IDEState *s,
> - uint8_t *buf,
> - const uint8_t *packet)
> +static void cmd_get_event_status_notification(IDEState *s,
> + uint8_t *buf)
> {
> + const uint8_t *packet = buf;
> +
Exploiting packet == buf. But do we want to go away from that?
Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-25 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 11:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] atapi: Some code restructuring Kevin Wolf
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] ide: Split atapi.c out Kevin Wolf
2011-04-25 10:09 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] ide/atapi: Factor commands out Kevin Wolf
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] ide/atapi: Use table instead of switch for commands Kevin Wolf
2011-04-20 18:13 ` Blue Swirl
2011-04-21 8:13 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-04-25 10:14 ` Amit Shah [this message]
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] ide/atapi: Replace bdrv_get_geometry calls by s->nb_sectors Kevin Wolf
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] ide/atapi: Introduce CHECK_READY flag for commands Kevin Wolf
2011-04-25 10:19 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110425101437.GC8308@amit-x200.redhat.com \
--to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).