Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] CPUPhysMemoryClient: Batch contiguous addresses when playing catchup

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:40:19PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 05/05/11 17:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >> > On 05/05/11 17:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>>> > >> > A memory size can obviously not be bigger than the maximum physical
> >>>>> > >> > address, so I find it really hard to see how this could overflow.
> >>> > > For example, a 4G size does not fit in 32 bits.
> >> > 
> >> > That is the only corner case
> > True.
> > 
> >> > you can handle that by -1 if you like.
> > But then all users need to be updated.
> > Seems easier to break out of the loop easier.
> > It's likely not a real problem, certainly not on a pc,
> > don't know about other systems.
> 
> I think it is quite fair to limit the amount of memory we support when
> running 32 bit qemu binaries. I would expect more things to break than
> just this if we tried to support 4GB of RAM on a 32 bit host.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jes

Fair enough.