From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMhBt-00030V-JB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 09:53:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMhBr-0006EV-6k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 09:53:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMhBq-0006EQ-TX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 09:53:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 10:53:21 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20110518105321.0a39efc7@doriath> In-Reply-To: <1305679930-4215-4-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1305679930-4215-1-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1305679930-4215-4-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1][ 03/23] error-propagation: build qemu with with error-propagation bits List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Roth Cc: aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, 17 May 2011 19:51:50 -0500 Michael Roth wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Michael Roth > --- > Makefile.objs | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile.objs b/Makefile.objs > index c49e44c..0803297 100644 > --- a/Makefile.objs > +++ b/Makefile.objs > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ oslib-obj-$(CONFIG_POSIX) += oslib-posix.o qemu-thread-posix.o > > block-obj-y = cutils.o cache-utils.o qemu-malloc.o qemu-option.o module.o async.o > block-obj-y += nbd.o block.o aio.o aes.o qemu-config.o qemu-progress.o qemu-sockets.o > +block-obj-y += error.o > block-obj-$(CONFIG_POSIX) += posix-aio-compat.o > block-obj-$(CONFIG_LINUX_AIO) += linux-aio.o This should be squashed in the previous patch, but it won't build as it depends on a change in qerror.c. I got this problem too, but (I hope that I) fixed it properly. I also made two small changes and am working on unit-tests.