From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42452) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QR06g-0004aG-NR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:53:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QR06f-0000Zp-Tg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:53:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QR06f-0000Zi-Mt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:53:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 16:23:43 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20110530105343.GA3480@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <20110527103458.GA30093@amit-x200.redhat.com> <1306751283-31537-1-git-send-email-cfergeau@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1306751283-31537-1-git-send-email-cfergeau@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix unused-but-set-variable warnings List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christophe Fergeau Cc: Hans de Goede , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno On (Mon) 30 May 2011 [12:28:01], Christophe Fergeau wrote: > Hi, > > Here are Hans's patches split and with the various issues that were pointed > out fixed. I'm not sure how I'm supposed to handle acks, original author, > ... when reworking patches this way, let me know if I should proceed > differently. You should keep From: as the same person, keep his Signed-off-by, add your Signed-off-by and mention what you have changed in the series. Thanks for re-sending this, btw. Amit