From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRHkD-0005Rt-Mh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 01:43:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRHkC-0005ND-So for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 01:43:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRHkC-0005N9-Gt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 01:43:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:13:45 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20110531054345.GA17412@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <20110527103458.GA30093@amit-x200.redhat.com> <1306751283-31537-1-git-send-email-cfergeau@redhat.com> <20110530105343.GA3480@amit-x200.redhat.com> <20110530133945.GB21467@teriyaki.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110530133945.GB21467@teriyaki.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix unused-but-set-variable warnings List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christophe Fergeau Cc: Hans de Goede , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno On (Mon) 30 May 2011 [15:56:28], Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:23:43PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > You should keep From: as the same person, keep his Signed-off-by, add > > your Signed-off-by and mention what you have changed in the series. > > Hans's patches didn't have a S-o-b. I can resend the same patches again > with my S-o-b (I'm fine with doing this without Hans's since I came up with > exactly the same patches independently from Hans) and detailing the changes > from the initial patch. Does that sound good? Yes, that's fine. Amit