From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com,
stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
wuzhy@cn.ibm.com, luowenj@cn.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC]QEMU disk I/O limits
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:18:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110602081856.GM18832@f12.cn.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306998902.2785.20.camel@lappy>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 10:15:02AM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
>Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:15:02 +0300
>From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
>To: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
> kvm@vger.kernel.org, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com,
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org, wuzhy@cn.ibm.com, luowenj@cn.ibm.com,
> zhanx@cn.ibm.com, zhaoyang@cn.ibm.com, llim@redhat.com,
> raharper@us.ibm.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC]QEMU disk I/O limits
>X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2
>
>On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 14:29 +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:17:06AM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> >Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:17:06 +0300
>> >From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
>> >To: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kwolf@redhat.com,
>> > aliguori@us.ibm.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
>> > guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, wuzhy@cn.ibm.com, luowenj@cn.ibm.com,
>> > zhanx@cn.ibm.com, zhaoyang@cn.ibm.com, llim@redhat.com,
>> > raharper@us.ibm.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>> >Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC]QEMU disk I/O limits
>> >X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 13:09 +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> >> Hello, all,
>> >>
>> >> I have prepared to work on a feature called "Disk I/O limits" for qemu-kvm projeect.
>> >> This feature will enable the user to cap disk I/O amount performed by a VM.It is important for some storage resources to be shared among multi-VMs. As you've known, if some of VMs are doing excessive disk I/O, they will hurt the performance of other VMs.
>> >>
>> >> More detail is available here:
>> >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/DiskIOLimits
>> >>
>> >> 1.) Why we need per-drive disk I/O limits
>> >> As you've known, for linux, cgroup blkio-controller has supported I/O throttling on block devices. More importantly, there is no single mechanism for disk I/O throttling across all underlying storage types (image file, LVM, NFS, Ceph) and for some types there is no way to throttle at all.
>> >>
>> >> Disk I/O limits feature introduces QEMU block layer I/O limits together with command-line and QMP interfaces for configuring limits. This allows I/O limits to be imposed across all underlying storage types using a single interface.
>> >>
>> >> 2.) How disk I/O limits will be implemented
>> >> QEMU block layer will introduce a per-drive disk I/O request queue for those disks whose "disk I/O limits" feature is enabled. It can control disk I/O limits individually for each disk when multiple disks are attached to a VM, and enable use cases like unlimited local disk access but shared storage access with limits.
>> >> In mutliple I/O threads scenario, when an application in a VM issues a block I/O request, this request will be intercepted by QEMU block layer, then it will calculate disk runtime I/O rate and determine if it has go beyond its limits. If yes, this I/O request will enqueue to that introduced queue; otherwise it will be serviced.
>> >>
>> >> 3.) How the users enable and play with it
>> >> QEMU -drive option will be extended so that disk I/O limits can be specified on its command line, such as -drive [iops=xxx,][throughput=xxx] or -drive [iops_rd=xxx,][iops_wr=xxx,][throughput=xxx] etc. When this argument is specified, it means that "disk I/O limits" feature is enabled for this drive disk.
>> >> The feature will also provide users with the ability to change per-drive disk I/O limits at runtime using QMP commands.
>> >
>> >I'm wondering if you've considered adding a 'burst' parameter -
>> >something which will not limit (or limit less) the io ops or the
>> >throughput for the first 'x' ms in a given time window.
>> Currently no, Do you let us know what scenario it will make sense to?
>
>My assumption is that most guests are not doing constant disk I/O
>access. Instead, the operations are usually short and happen on small
>scale (relatively small amount of bytes accessed).
>
>For example: Multiple table DB lookup, serving a website, file servers.
>
>Basically, if I need to do a DB lookup which needs 50MB of data from a
>disk which is limited to 10MB/s, I'd rather let it burst for 1 second
>and complete the lookup faster instead of having it read data for 5
>seconds.
>
>If the guest now starts running multiple lookups one after the other,
>thats when I would like to limit.
HI, Sasha,
If iops or bps parameters are not specified to -drive, it will not limit this disk I/O rate. Of course, QMP commands will be extended to support changing or disabling disk I/O limits at runtime. If you'd like not limit a disk I/O rate, you can use it to disabled this feature.
I don't make sure that this is the right answer for your question.
Regards,
Zhiyong Wu
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Zhiyong Wu
>> >
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Zhiyong Wu
>> >>
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Sasha.
>> >
>
>--
>
>Sasha.
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-30 5:09 [Qemu-devel] [RFC]QEMU disk I/O limits Zhi Yong Wu
2011-05-31 13:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 13:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-31 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 14:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-31 17:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 18:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-31 19:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 23:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-01 13:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-01 21:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-01 21:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-01 22:28 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-04 8:54 ` Blue Swirl
2011-05-31 20:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-31 22:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-31 13:56 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-05-31 14:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 14:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-05-31 14:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 15:28 ` Ryan Harper
2011-05-31 19:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-01 3:12 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2011-06-02 9:33 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-06-03 6:56 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2011-06-01 3:19 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2011-06-01 13:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-02 6:07 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2011-06-02 6:17 ` Sasha Levin
2011-06-02 6:29 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2011-06-02 7:15 ` Sasha Levin
2011-06-02 8:18 ` Zhi Yong Wu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110602081856.GM18832@f12.cn.ibm.com \
--to=wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=luowenj@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=wuzhy@cn.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).