From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/10]: QMP/HMP: Introduce tray handling commands
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:56:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110606115648.5f188d2a@doriath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m362oj6q88.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:31:35 +0200
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > In a recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the introduction of
> > the BLOCK_TRAY_OPEN and BLOCK_TRAY_CLOSE events[1], it was mentioned that
> > we need to fix the eject command and maybe introduce new commands first.
> >
> > Here's a my proposal.
> >
> > This series introduces three new commands:
> >
> > o blockdev-tray-open: opens the drive tray. Also Supports removing the inserted
> > media. The BLOCK_TRAY_OPEN event is emitted if this command succeeds.
>
> Conflates tray control with media control. Hmm.
>
> > o blockdev-tray-close: closes a drive tray. The BLOCK_TRAY_CLOSE event is
> > emitted.
> > o blockdev-media-insert: Inserts a media in the tray. The tray must empty
> > and already opened. No event is emitted.
>
> What about separating tray control and media control like this:
>
> * Tray control: either blockdev-tray-open and blockdev-tray-close, or a
> single blockdev-tray with a boolean argument.
This might sound like a simple thing, but sometimes I'm really undecided when
something should be a new argument or a new command.
Following Anthony's idea that it can be helpful to think in a C interface,
I slightly prefer this:
blockdev_tray_open(device);
...
blockdev_tray_close(device);
Than this:
blockdev_tray(device, TRAY_OPEN);
...
blockdev_tray(device, TRAY_CLOSE);
> * Media control: blockdev-media to change media. Tray must be open, may
> or may not contain media. Arguments specify new media, or no media.
Yeah, maybe it's better to drop the 'remove' flag from the open command.
But then I think I prefer having blockdev-media-remove and
blockdev-media-insert instead of a single blockdev-media command.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-03 19:03 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/10]: QMP/HMP: Introduce tray handling commands Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 19:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/10] block: bdrv_eject(): Add 'force' parameter Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 19:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 02/10] block: Rename bdrv_mon_event() Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 19:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/10] QMP: query-block: Add the 'tray-open' key Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 19:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 04/10] HMP: info block: Print " Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-06 13:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-06 14:46 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 19:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 05/10] QMP: Introduce the blockdev-tray-open command Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-06 11:40 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-06 14:38 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 13:29 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-07 13:53 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-06 13:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-03 19:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 06/10] QMP: Introduce the blockdev-tray-close command Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 19:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 07/10] QMP: Introduce the blockdev-media-insert command Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-06 11:44 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-06 13:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-06 14:58 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 19:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 08/10] QMP: Introduce the BLOCK_TRAY_OPEN and BLOCK_TRAY_CLOSE events Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 19:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 09/10] QMP/HMP: eject: Use blockdev-tray-open Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 19:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 10/10] QMP/HMP: change: Use QMP tray commands Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-06 11:48 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-06 14:45 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 13:32 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-06 13:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/10]: QMP/HMP: Introduce tray handling commands Markus Armbruster
2011-06-06 14:56 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2011-12-20 6:49 ` Osier Yang
2012-01-03 19:28 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-11 7:34 ` Osier Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110606115648.5f188d2a@doriath \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).