From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56285)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1QXCgr-0004yT-Qb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:33:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1QXCgi-0005Ks-1b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:32:56 -0400
Received: from mtagate4.uk.ibm.com ([194.196.100.164]:42630)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1QXCgh-0005KF-Jr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:32:47 -0400
Received: from d06nrmr1707.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
	(d06nrmr1707.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.39.225])
	by mtagate4.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p5GAanKl001457
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:36:49 GMT
Received: from d06av08.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av08.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
	[9.149.37.249])
	by d06nrmr1707.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with
	ESMTP id p5GAaiQu2031756
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:36:49 +0100
Received: from d06av08.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d06av08.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with
	ESMTP id p5GAaiUN019947
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:36:44 +0100
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:36:42 +0100
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20110616103642.GA16620@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain>
References: <20110518155803.GA23434@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain>
	<2E7A71644A98EC4983B36C4946F763F133F0AB@blr-mgr-msg.wipro.com>
	<BANLkTiko2v=HpJYQA_r97wUPk8iBaf1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<2E7A71644A98EC4983B36C4946F763F133F0AF@blr-mgr-msg.wipro.com>
	<BANLkTikTYV8Kr9GD+D=AtHkVo_Eh8sZV7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<2E7A71644A98EC4983B36C4946F763F13C6B3C@blr-mgr-msg.wipro.com>
	<BANLkTimyq630S_pQeJQMh7mawhH5yaDVGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<2E7A71644A98EC4983B36C4946F763F13C712B@blr-mgr-msg.wipro.com>
	<BANLkTi=va17HvKDEAmbbQSzeB83PNWkOHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<2E7A71644A98EC4983B36C4946F763F13C7492@blr-mgr-msg.wipro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2E7A71644A98EC4983B36C4946F763F13C7492@blr-mgr-msg.wipro.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Base server as file server.
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: arun.sasi1@wipro.com
Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com, stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 03:26:25PM +0530, arun.sasi1@wipro.com wrote:
> Will I get complete performance on file server since it is in Base
> server where KVM kernel installed...

Yes, applications running on the host will performance as normal.
Remember that virtual machines consume CPU, memory, and other resources
too though.  That means busy VMs can affect application performance on
the host.

Stefan