From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:16:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110617101644.5e275e53@doriath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110617064736.GA18513@amit-x200.redhat.com>
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:17:36 +0530
Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> wrote:
> On (Thu) 16 Jun 2011 [13:38:49], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > If I start qemu with:
> >
> > # qemu -hda disks/test.img -enable-kvm -m 1G -snapshot \
> > -device virtio-serial \
> > -chardev socket,host=localhost,port=1234,server,nowait,id=foo \
> > -device virtserialport,chardev=foo,name=org.qemu.guest_agent
> >
> > I get a segfault when booting a Fedora 14 guest. The backtrace says:
> >
> > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> > #0 0x0000000000420850 in handle_control_message (vser=0x3732bd0, buf=0x2c173e0, len=8) at /home/lcapitulino/src/qmp-unstable/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c:335
> > 335 info = DO_UPCAST(VirtIOSerialPortInfo, qdev, port->dev.info);
>
> Strange, I've not seen it so far in my testing (neither in the daily
> test runs of the virtio-serial testsuite).
>
> > I've also bisected this and git points out to commit:
> >
> > commit a15bb0d6a981de749452a5180fc8084d625671da
> > Author: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> > Date: Wed May 25 14:21:13 2011 +0200
> >
> > virtio-serial: Drop redundant VirtIOSerialPort member info
> >
> > I think what's happening is that the device is not initialized on a
> > VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY event. Moving the DO_UPCAST() call to
> > the other events fixes the problem to me.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/virtio-serial-bus.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c b/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
> > index 9a12104..579f676 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
> > @@ -332,8 +332,6 @@ static void handle_control_message(VirtIOSerial *vser, void *buf, size_t len)
> > if (!port && cpkt.event != VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY)
> > return;
> >
> > - info = DO_UPCAST(VirtIOSerialPortInfo, qdev, port->dev.info);
> > -
>
> Ah - this missed the !port check. It should be possible to do this in
> a 'if (port)' block instead of replicating in the individual case
> statements.
>
> Thanks for the debugging and patch; please update with the above and
> I'll apply it to the virtio-serial tree.
What about moving the VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY handling out of the
switch, like the patch below? This way the function is divided in a way
that related events are handled together.
I'll implement your first suggestion if you don't like this...
diff --git a/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c b/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
index 579f676..5f96245 100644
--- a/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
+++ b/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
@@ -325,19 +325,12 @@ static void handle_control_message(VirtIOSerial *vser, void *buf, size_t len)
return;
}
- cpkt.event = lduw_p(&gcpkt->event);
cpkt.value = lduw_p(&gcpkt->value);
-
- port = find_port_by_id(vser, ldl_p(&gcpkt->id));
- if (!port && cpkt.event != VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY)
- return;
-
- switch(cpkt.event) {
- case VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY:
+ cpkt.event = lduw_p(&gcpkt->event);
+ if (cpkt.event == VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY) {
if (!cpkt.value) {
- error_report("virtio-serial-bus: Guest failure in adding device %s\n",
- vser->bus.qbus.name);
- break;
+ error_report("virtio-serial-bus: Guest failure in adding device %s\n", vser->bus.qbus.name);
+ return;
}
/*
* The device is up, we can now tell the device about all the
@@ -346,8 +339,13 @@ static void handle_control_message(VirtIOSerial *vser, void *buf, size_t len)
QTAILQ_FOREACH(port, &vser->ports, next) {
send_control_event(port, VIRTIO_CONSOLE_PORT_ADD, 1);
}
- break;
+ return;
+ }
+ port = find_port_by_id(vser, ldl_p(&gcpkt->id));
+ assert(port != NULL);
+
+ switch(cpkt.event) {
case VIRTIO_CONSOLE_PORT_READY:
if (!cpkt.value) {
error_report("virtio-serial-bus: Guest failure in adding port %u for device %s\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-16 16:38 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-17 6:47 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-17 7:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-17 8:44 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-17 13:16 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2011-06-17 13:21 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-17 16:09 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-17 18:08 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-18 3:42 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-18 21:43 ` Blue Swirl
2011-06-22 4:53 ` Amit Shah
2011-06-26 17:43 ` Blue Swirl
2011-06-27 9:48 ` [Qemu-devel] 80-column rule and breaking output statements Amit Shah
2011-07-01 19:43 ` Blue Swirl
2011-07-02 8:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-07-04 6:05 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110617101644.5e275e53@doriath \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).