From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55237) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbooW-0002A5-CQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:03:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbooS-0002YL-C1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:03:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbooR-0002YG-VD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:03:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:33:45 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20110629070318.GA28279@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Query on the License of qemu List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?utf-8?B?67CV7J6s66+8?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On (Tue) 28 Jun 2011 [10:49:03], =EB=B0=95=EC=9E=AC=EB=AF=BC wrote: > Dear All, > This is Jaemin Park, who delves into qemu. >=20 > I have 2 questions about the license of qemu. Legal questions should go to lawyers, not developers. Amit