From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49696)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hch@lst.de>)
	id 1QbvBO-0001c7-E0
	for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:51:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1QbvBN-0005Ab-1v
	for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:51:58 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:42765 helo=newverein.lst.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hch@lst.de>)
	id 1QbvBM-0005AH-JA
	for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:51:56 -0400
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:51:56 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Message-ID: <20110629135156.GC15863@lst.de>
References: <4E0B1399.4050807@redhat.com> <4E0B152B.1000201@codemonkey.ws>
	<4E0B1787.30709@redhat.com> <4E0B1943.4090400@codemonkey.ws>
	<4E0B1B62.9080309@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E0B1B62.9080309@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Default cache mode
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:32:34PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Christoph, it looks like we're back to your WCE patches then. Do you
> still work on them?

The IDE patch is ready once the bdrv_reopen from the hostcache patches
goes in.  Virtio still needs to be redesigned to use a command instead
of config space, and SCSI is not doable without a major SCSI layer
redesign.