From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbvGE-0002wF-Te for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:56:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbvGD-00070Y-Ep for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:56:58 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:52132 helo=newverein.lst.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbvGD-00070T-0q for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:56:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:56:56 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Message-ID: <20110629135656.GE15863@lst.de> References: <4E0B1399.4050807@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Default cache mode List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin Wolf , Stefan Hajnoczi , Qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity , Christoph Hellwig On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:52:19PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > Whether it is safe to transition to cache=none or not depends on what > broken guests are still widely deployed. Does CentOS 5 flush the disk > cache? Unless you use ext3 it does. The same unfortunate story still applies to current Linux mainline.