qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"blauwirbel@gmail.com" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
	Yoder Stuart-B08248 <B08248@freescale.com>,
	"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"joerg.roedel@amd.com" <joerg.roedel@amd.com>,
	"dwg@au1.ibm.com" <dwg@au1.ibm.com>,
	"armbru@redhat.com" <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] device assignment for embedded Power
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:51:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110701125107.4ca49c61@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107011216.36181.paul@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:16:35 +0100
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> > One feature we need for QEMU/KVM on embedded Power Architecture is the
> > ability to do passthru assignment of SoC I/O devices and memory.  An
> > important use case in embedded is creating static partitions--
> > taking physical memory and I/O devices (non-PCI) and partitioning
> > them between the host Linux and several virtual machines.   Things like
> > live migration would not be needed or supported in these types of
> > scenarios.
> > 
> > SoC devices do not sit on a probeable bus and there are no identifiers
> > like 01:00.0 with PCI that we can use to identify devices--  the host
> > Linux kernel is made aware of SoC I/O devices from nodes/properties in a
> > device tree structure passed at boot.   QEMU needs to generate a
> > device tree to pass to the guest as well with all the guest's virtual
> > and physical resources.  Today a number of mostly complete guest device
> > trees are kept under ./pc-bios in QEMU, but this too static and
> > inflexible.
> 
> I doubt you're going to get generic passthrough of arbitrary devices working 
> in a useful way.

It's usefully working for us internally -- we're just trying to find a way
to improve it for upstream, with a better configuration mechanism.

> My expectation is that, at minimum, you'll need a bus 
> specific proxy device. i.e. create a virtual device in qemu that responds to 
> the guest, and happens poke at a host device rather than emulating things 
> directly.

Many of these embedded devices don't sit on any sort of software-visible
bus, and requiring that the I/O happen via MMIO traps would result in
unacceptable overhead.

> Basically you have to emulate  everything that is different between the host and guest.

Directly assigning a device means you don't get to have differences between
the actual hardware device and what the guest sees.  The kind of thin
wrapper you're suggesting might have some use cases, but it's a different
problem from what we're trying to solve.

-Scott

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-01 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-30 15:59 [Qemu-devel] device assignment for embedded Power Yoder Stuart-B08248
2011-07-01  0:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-01 11:40   ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-01 12:13     ` Anthony Liguori
2011-07-01 12:10   ` Anthony Liguori
2011-07-01 12:52     ` Paul Brook
2011-07-01 13:33       ` Anthony Liguori
2011-07-01 16:43     ` Scott Wood
2011-07-01 17:03       ` Paul Brook
2011-07-01 17:49         ` Scott Wood
2011-07-01 20:59           ` Paul Brook
2011-07-01 21:51             ` Scott Wood
2011-07-01 23:33               ` Paul Brook
2011-07-01 23:05             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-01 23:50               ` Paul Brook
2011-07-02  2:17                 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-02 11:45                   ` Paul Brook
2011-07-01 22:35         ` Anthony Liguori
2011-07-01 22:32       ` Anthony Liguori
2011-07-05 18:16         ` Scott Wood
2011-07-01 16:34   ` Scott Wood
2011-07-05 18:19   ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2011-07-05 22:23     ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-01 11:16 ` Paul Brook
2011-07-01 11:33   ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-01 11:55     ` Paul Brook
2011-07-01 12:02       ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-01 12:14         ` Anthony Liguori
2011-07-01 17:51   ` Scott Wood [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110701125107.4ca49c61@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=B07421@freescale.com \
    --cc=B08248@freescale.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).