From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37778)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1QheTg-0002RG-H8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:14:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1QheTb-00018s-DF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:14:32 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24018)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1QheTa-00018i-V4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:14:27 -0400
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6F9EQjN020571
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:14:26 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:13:47 +0300
From: Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20110715091347.GN23682@bow.tlv.redhat.com>
References: <1310670801-14687-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com>
	<1310670801-14687-12-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com>
	<4E1FF838.1010305@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E1FF838.1010305@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv5 11/12] qxl: bump pci rev
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: yhalperi@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:20:08AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >+#if SPICE_INTERFACE_QXL_MINOR>= 1
> >+#define QXL_DEFAULT_REVISION QXL_REVISION_STABLE_V10
> >+#else
> >+#define QXL_DEFAULT_REVISION QXL_REVISION_STABLE_V06
> >+#endif
> 
> Does that actually build with old spice-protocol?  I don't think so ...
> 

no, it won't. /me wonders how I did the compilations. I'll use 2 and 3.

> cheers,
>   Gerd
>