From: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: Length-align config space accesses
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:17:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110720161702.GL3699@valinux.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E26E5BC.6040508@siemens.com>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:27:08PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-07-20 14:15, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2011-07-20 14:00, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> >> Hi. This clean up looks good basically.
> >
> > Oops, forgot to cc you. Sorry.
> >
> >> But when conventional pci device is accessed via MMCONFIG area,
> >> addr &= addr_mask doesn't work as expected.
> >> The config area of [256, 4K) of conventional pci should have no effect.
> >
> > Mmh, I see. Looks like we need to split accesses at this boundary and
> > executed them separately.
>
> Nope, no such issue: we already automatically split up accesses that
> span the legacy/extended boundary. Just like so far, legacy config space
> handlers have to filter out requests that address regions >= 256.
For example, when accessing to offset 257 of conventional pci device,
the access is routed to offset 1 due to the masking.
Such overwrapping isn't correct.
--
yamahata
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-20 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 21:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: Length-align config space accesses Jan Kiszka
2011-07-20 12:00 ` Isaku Yamahata
2011-07-20 12:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-20 14:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-20 16:17 ` Isaku Yamahata [this message]
2011-07-20 16:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-20 16:33 ` Isaku Yamahata
2011-07-20 16:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-20 17:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-20 20:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-20 16:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-20 14:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-20 14:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-20 15:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110720161702.GL3699@valinux.co.jp \
--to=yamahata@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).