From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60843)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hch@lst.de>)
	id 1QmPW2-0002Nu-W3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:16:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1QmPW1-00051A-Lx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:16:38 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:60261 helo=newverein.lst.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hch@lst.de>)
	id 1QmPW1-000512-GD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:16:37 -0400
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:16:37 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Message-ID: <20110728121637.GA17234@lst.de>
References: <CAJSP0QWqFaTd7Pv-Jo7fBE_eqGcgr7Hy4WQ+GcnwW+wGmZeKTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110728120931.GB17045@lst.de>
	<CAHt6W4cs-ULyqJAK0S=uEcazvZB0_9+KwtRS8MWX1Pj1iRSDKQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHt6W4cs-ULyqJAK0S=uEcazvZB0_9+KwtRS8MWX1Pj1iRSDKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Block layer roadmap
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, devin122@gmail.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Jagane Sundar <jagane@sundar.org>, Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Feiran Zheng <famcool@gmail.com>, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:15:38PM +0200, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> 
> This has nothing (or few) to do with threads. Instead of splitting
> functions in callbacks at every synchronous function it allow to write
> more readable code.

Thanks for repeating my statement that it doesn't fix the real thing
but just adds syntactic sugar.