From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmSLp-0007qb-6p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:18:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmSLo-0007dQ-0g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:18:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmSLn-0007dJ-Pr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:18:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:18:11 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20110728121811.11dc8434@doriath> In-Reply-To: <4E316FE7.6030005@web.de> References: <20110727154229.656532d4@doriath> <4E310E6A.6000004@redhat.com> <20110728103143.548d7bb1@doriath> <4E3165FD.7040805@redhat.com> <4E316FE7.6030005@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Introduce vm_stop_permanent() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Blue Swirl , Avi Kivity , qemu-devel On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:19 +0200 Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-07-28 15:37, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 07/28/2011 04:31 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:22 +0300 > >> Avi Kivity wrote: > >> > >> > On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, Blue Swirl wrote: > >> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz > >> Capitulino wrote: > >> > > > This function should be used when the VM is not supposed to > >> resume > >> > > > execution (eg. by issuing 'cont' monitor command). > >> > > > > >> > > > Today, we allow the user to resume execution even when: > >> > > > > >> > > > o the guest shuts down and -no-shutdown is used > >> > > > o there's a kvm internal error > >> > > > o loading the VM state with -loadvm or "loadvm" in the > >> monitor fails > >> > > > > >> > > > I think only badness can happen from the cases above. > >> > > > >> > > I'd suppose a system_reset should bring the system back to > >> sanity and > >> > > then clear vm_permanent_stopped (where's -ly?) > >> > >> What's -ly? > >> > > > > permanent-ly. > > > >> > > except maybe for KVM > >> > > internal error if that can't be recovered. Then it would not very > >> > > permanent anymore, so the name would need adjusting. > >> > > >> > Currently, all kvm internal errors are recoverable by reset (and > >> > possibly by fiddling with memory/registers). > >> > >> Ok, but a poweroff in the guest isn't recoverable with system_reset > >> right? Or does it depend on the guest? > > > > Right, it's not recoverable if you shut the power down where the tractor > > beam is coupled to the main reactor. > > system_reset will bring all emulated devices back into their power-on > state - unless we have remaining bugs to fix. Actually, one may consider > issuing this reset automatically on vm_start after "permant" vm_stop. I'm going to abandon the vm_stop_permanent() idea. I'm thinking something towards having a stop_kind argument to vm_stop(), which could be temporary (which is what we have today), only with system_reset or permanent. Or maybe vm_stop_opt(), which allows for fine grained control of stop (vm_stop() would default to today's behavior)...