From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57871)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hch@lst.de>)
	id 1Qnb1w-0003bk-6a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:46:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1Qnb1v-00070o-0Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:46:28 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51194 helo=newverein.lst.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hch@lst.de>)
	id 1Qnb1u-00070g-SC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:46:26 -0400
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:46:25 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Message-ID: <20110731184625.GA14622@lst.de>
References: <4E2DFAE5.1050304@codemonkey.ws> <m3oc0h5jos.fsf@neno.neno>
	<4E2EB522.2000808@codemonkey.ws> <4E32BD96.9030806@redhat.com>
	<4E32C385.5020702@codemonkey.ws> <4E32CF52.9080203@redhat.com>
	<4E33340D.5050003@codemonkey.ws> <4E353314.8070403@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA8TaQNzvDVeMeNCbVE-gh1tn24R0zqm_VbCVpSKoWs8uw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E354043.6050203@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E354043.6050203@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] Fix subsection ambiguity in
	the	migration format
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, mst@redhat.com, Ryan Harper <ryanh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 02:45:07PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
>> No, definitely not. I think most people using non-x86 architectures
>> don't use the vmsave/vmload/migration features at all, but would
>> be annoyed if the perfectly functional device models they were
>> using got deleted...
>
> I didn't mean to erase the entire device, just the code for save/load which 
> as you say, might not be used at all.

Like the one in virtio?