From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46453)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rickv@hobi.com>) id 1Qnuk2-0002Qq-IK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:49:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rickv@hobi.com>) id 1Qnuk1-0000BY-CI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:49:18 -0400
Received: from hobi.com ([161.58.203.140]:35132)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rickv@hobi.com>) id 1Qnuk1-0000BU-9p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:49:17 -0400
From: Rick Vernam <rickv@hobi.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:49:11 -0500
References: <201107282148.14378.rickv@hobi.com> <4E36B978.2090200@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E36B978.2090200@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201108011049.11897.rickv@hobi.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.15 testing, spice, wxp
Reply-To: rickv@hobi.com
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Monday 01 August 2011 09:34:32 Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 07/29/11 04:48, Rick Vernam wrote:
> > I'd like to do some very high-level testing of qemu-stable-0.15
> > (qemu-system- x86_64, specifically) running Linux host, Windows XP SP3
> > guest.
> > I'm afraid that I don't have a ready environment for building the windows
> > guest bits, and the added time requirement simply puts it over the top
> > for me. Are there updated spice windows guest binaries available
> > anywhere?  I suppose this would just be the QXL video driver and the
> > guest agent?  From looking at spice-space.org/download.html I concluded
> > that I'm looking for verion 0.8.x, but my searches have left me empty
> > handed.
> 
> Just use the most recent versions from spice-space.org/download.html,
> they should work just fine with 0.15
> 
> HTH,
>    Gerd

Most recent windows binaries are 0.6.x.  They've been working well for the 
past few months, thank you.
I take it, then, that there are no 0.8.x compiled binaries for 0.8.x?

Thanks,
-Rick