From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp3PR-0008DQ-O0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:16:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp3PQ-0003Re-FU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:16:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp3PQ-0003RQ-5a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:16:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 22:17:17 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20110804191717.GB25722@redhat.com> References: <4E36E5F7.6060202@cisco.com> <4E393575.4090003@redhat.com> <20110803122441.GB10538@redhat.com> <4E395363.5000200@cisco.com> <20110803150021.GA13515@redhat.com> <4E3AE991.1080009@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E3AE991.1080009@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm aborts - vhost_dev_unassign_memory: Assertion `to >= 0' failed. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Ahern Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, Avi Kivity , KVM mailing list , qemu-devel On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 12:48:49PM -0600, David Ahern wrote: > > > On 08/03/2011 09:00 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:55:47AM -0600, David Ahern wrote: > >> Tested-by: David Ahern > >> > >> David > > > > Applied, thanks very much. > > > > I assume this will make 0.15 since it is a regression? How is this a regression in 0.15? I thought it's an old bug exposed by the memory API which I expect is not going into 0.15. > haven't seen the > patch applied to that branch yet. > > David My branch will have to get merged in trunk first. -- MST