From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwBCo-0007Jh-16 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:01:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwBCm-0002zE-J9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:01:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwBCm-0002z1-C4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:01:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:01:56 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20110824110156.GA17772@redhat.com> References: <4E53E328.90601@siemens.com> <20110824100439.GA17255@redhat.com> <4E54CE18.1080508@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E54CE18.1080508@siemens.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: Error on PCI capability collisions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Alex Williamson , qemu-devel On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:10:32PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-08-24 12:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:28:08PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> From: Alex Williamson > >> > >> Nothing good can happen when we overlap capabilities > >> > >> [ Jan: rebased over qemu, minor formatting ] > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka > >=20 > > This doesn't build for me: > >=20 > > /scm/qemu/hw/pci.c: In function =E2=80=98pci_add_capability=E2=80=99: > > /scm/qemu/hw/pci.c:1970:45: error: =E2=80=98PCIDevice=E2=80=99 has no= member named =E2=80=98config_map=E2=80=99 >=20 > Yeah, sorry, forgot to refresh the commit before posting. Happens to me too, sometimes. > >=20 > > I think that what that includes is the capability including each give= n > > offset, right? It would be easy to write some code scanning the > > capability list to figure this value out. > > Something along the lines of (untested): > >=20 > > static > > uint8_t pci_find_capability_at_offset(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t offset= ) > > { =20 > > uint8_t next, prev, found =3D 0; > >=20 > > if (!(pdev->config[PCI_STATUS] & PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST)) > > return 0; > >=20 > > for (prev =3D PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST; (next =3D pdev->config[prev]); > > prev =3D next + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT) > > if (next <=3D offset && next > found) > > found =3D next; > >=20 > > return found; > > } >=20 > Sounds useful, will enhance the patch. >=20 > (Originally, I just wanted to reduce the qemu-kvm delta... :) ) >=20 > Jan Oh, if you want to just drop that bit, that's also fine. Up to you. --=20 MST