From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwPhO-00038b-9T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:29:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwPhL-000815-Oc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:29:42 -0400 Received: from e23smtp04.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.146]:46999) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwPhL-00080e-88 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:29:39 -0400 Received: from d23relay03.au.ibm.com (d23relay03.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.245]) by e23smtp04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p7P2MwO5000720 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:22:58 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay03.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p7P2TSog1974406 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:29:28 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p7P2TRMd029110 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:29:28 +1000 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:23:50 +1000 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20110825022350.GL30097@yookeroo.fritz.box> References: <1314199732-25529-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <286B9428-BF1B-4F56-A126-8FA337BF5643@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <286B9428-BF1B-4F56-A126-8FA337BF5643@suse.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vscsi: send the CHECK_CONDITION status down together with autosense data List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel Developers , thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:41:34PM -0500, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 24.08.2011, at 10:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > I introduced this bug in commit 05751d3 (vscsi: always use get_sense, > > 2011-08-03) because at the time there was no way to expose a sense > > condition to SLOF and Linux manages to work around the bug. However, > > the bug becomes evident now that SCSI devices also report unit > > attention on reset. > > > > SLOF also has problems dealing with unit attention conditions, so > > it still will not boot even with this fix (just like OpenBIOS). > > IBM folks are aware of their part of the bug. :-) > > David, please ack. Done. We also need to get the updated SLOF into place, I can't remember how we sent commits involving binary blobs previously. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson