qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@au1.ibm.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <pmac@au1.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Aaron Fabbri <aafabbri@cisco.com>,
	iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"benve@cisco.com" <benve@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kvm PCI assignment & VFIO ramblings
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:54:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110825105402.GB1923@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314220434.2859.203.camel@bling.home>

Hi Alex,

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 05:13:49PM -0400, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Is this roughly what you're thinking of for the iommu_group component?
> Adding a dev_to_group iommu ops callback let's us consolidate the sysfs
> support in the iommu base.  Would AMD-Vi do something similar (or
> exactly the same) for group #s?  Thanks,

The concept looks good, I have some comments, though. On AMD-Vi the
implementation would look a bit different because there is a
data-structure were the information can be gathered from, so no need for
PCI bus scanning there.

> diff --git a/drivers/base/iommu.c b/drivers/base/iommu.c
> index 6e6b6a1..6b54c1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/iommu.c
> @@ -17,20 +17,56 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/bug.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>  
>  static struct iommu_ops *iommu_ops;
>  
> +static ssize_t show_iommu_group(struct device *dev,
> +				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%lx", iommu_dev_to_group(dev));

Probably add a 0x prefix so userspace knows the format?

> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(iommu_group, S_IRUGO, show_iommu_group, NULL);
> +
> +static int add_iommu_group(struct device *dev, void *unused)
> +{
> +	if (iommu_dev_to_group(dev) >= 0)
> +		return device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_iommu_group);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int device_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +			   unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = data;
> +
> +	if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE)
> +		return add_iommu_group(dev, NULL);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block device_nb = {
> +	.notifier_call = device_notifier,
> +};
> +
>  void register_iommu(struct iommu_ops *ops)
>  {
>  	if (iommu_ops)
>  		BUG();
>  
>  	iommu_ops = ops;
> +
> +	/* FIXME - non-PCI, really want for_each_bus() */
> +	bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, &device_nb);
> +	bus_for_each_dev(&pci_bus_type, NULL, NULL, add_iommu_group);
>  }

We need to solve this differently. ARM is starting to use the iommu-api
too and this definitly does not work there. One possible solution might
be to make the iommu-ops per-bus.

>  bool iommu_found(void)
> @@ -94,6 +130,14 @@ int iommu_domain_has_cap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_domain_has_cap);
>  
> +long iommu_dev_to_group(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	if (iommu_ops->dev_to_group)
> +		return iommu_ops->dev_to_group(dev);
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_dev_to_group);

Please rename this to iommu_device_group(). The dev_to_group name
suggests a conversion but it is actually just a property of the device.
Also the return type should not be long but something that fits into
32bit on all platforms. Since you use -ENODEV, probably s32 is a good
choice.

> +
>  int iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>  	      phys_addr_t paddr, int gfp_order, int prot)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> index f02c34d..477259c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ static int dmar_map_gfx = 1;
>  static int dmar_forcedac;
>  static int intel_iommu_strict;
>  static int intel_iommu_superpage = 1;
> +static int intel_iommu_no_mf_groups;
>  
>  #define DUMMY_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO ((struct device_domain_info *)(-1))
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(device_domain_lock);
> @@ -438,6 +439,10 @@ static int __init intel_iommu_setup(char *str)
>  			printk(KERN_INFO
>  				"Intel-IOMMU: disable supported super page\n");
>  			intel_iommu_superpage = 0;
> +		} else if (!strncmp(str, "no_mf_groups", 12)) {
> +			printk(KERN_INFO
> +				"Intel-IOMMU: disable separate groups for multifunction devices\n");
> +			intel_iommu_no_mf_groups = 1;

This should really be a global iommu option and not be VT-d specific.

>  
>  		str += strcspn(str, ",");
> @@ -3902,6 +3907,52 @@ static int intel_iommu_domain_has_cap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/* Group numbers are arbitrary.  Device with the same group number
> + * indicate the iommu cannot differentiate between them.  To avoid
> + * tracking used groups we just use the seg|bus|devfn of the lowest
> + * level we're able to differentiate devices */
> +static long intel_iommu_dev_to_group(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	struct pci_dev *bridge;
> +	union {
> +		struct {
> +			u8 devfn;
> +			u8 bus;
> +			u16 segment;
> +		} pci;
> +		u32 group;
> +	} id;
> +
> +	if (iommu_no_mapping(dev))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	id.pci.segment = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
> +	id.pci.bus = pdev->bus->number;
> +	id.pci.devfn = pdev->devfn;
> +
> +	if (!device_to_iommu(id.pci.segment, id.pci.bus, id.pci.devfn))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	bridge = pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge(pdev);
> +	if (bridge) {
> +		if (pci_is_pcie(bridge)) {
> +			id.pci.bus = bridge->subordinate->number;
> +			id.pci.devfn = 0;
> +		} else {
> +			id.pci.bus = bridge->bus->number;
> +			id.pci.devfn = bridge->devfn;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Virtual functions always get their own group */
> +	if (!pdev->is_virtfn && intel_iommu_no_mf_groups)
> +		id.pci.devfn = PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(id.pci.devfn), 0);
> +
> +	/* FIXME - seg # >= 0x8000 on 32b */
> +	return id.group;
> +}

This looks like code duplication in the VT-d driver. It doesn't need to
be generalized now, but we should keep in mind to do a more general
solution later.
Maybe it is beneficial if the IOMMU drivers only setup the number in
dev->arch.iommu.groupid and the iommu-api fetches it from there then.
But as I said, this is some more work and does not need to be done for
this patch(-set).

> +
>  static struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
>  	.domain_init	= intel_iommu_domain_init,
>  	.domain_destroy = intel_iommu_domain_destroy,
> @@ -3911,6 +3962,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
>  	.unmap		= intel_iommu_unmap,
>  	.iova_to_phys	= intel_iommu_iova_to_phys,
>  	.domain_has_cap = intel_iommu_domain_has_cap,
> +	.dev_to_group	= intel_iommu_dev_to_group,
>  };
>  
>  static void __devinit quirk_iommu_rwbf(struct pci_dev *dev)
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 0a2ba40..90c1a86 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct iommu_ops {
>  				    unsigned long iova);
>  	int (*domain_has_cap)(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  			      unsigned long cap);
> +	long (*dev_to_group)(struct device *dev);
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_API
> @@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ extern phys_addr_t iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  				      unsigned long iova);
>  extern int iommu_domain_has_cap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  				unsigned long cap);
> +extern long iommu_dev_to_group(struct device *dev);
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_IOMMU_API */
>  
> @@ -121,6 +123,10 @@ static inline int domain_has_cap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline long iommu_dev_to_group(struct device *dev);
> +{
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_IOMMU_API */
>  
>  #endif /* __LINUX_IOMMU_H */
> 
> 
> 

-- 
AMD Operating System Research Center

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-25 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1311983933.8793.42.camel@pasglop>
2011-07-30 18:20 ` [Qemu-devel] kvm PCI assignment & VFIO ramblings Alex Williamson
2011-07-30 23:54   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-01 18:59     ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-02  2:00       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-30 23:55   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-02  8:28   ` David Gibson
2011-08-02 18:14     ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-02 18:35       ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-03  2:04         ` David Gibson
2011-08-03  3:44           ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-04  0:39             ` David Gibson
2011-08-08  8:28           ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-09 23:24             ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-10  2:48               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-20 16:51                 ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-22  5:55                   ` David Gibson
2011-08-22 15:45                     ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-22 21:01                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-23 19:30                         ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-23 23:51                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-24  3:40                             ` Alexander Graf
2011-08-24 14:47                             ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-24  8:43                           ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-24 14:56                             ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-25 11:01                               ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-23  2:38                       ` David Gibson
2011-08-23 16:23                         ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-23 23:41                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-24  3:36                             ` Alexander Graf
2011-08-22  6:30                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-22 10:46                     ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-22 10:51                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-22 12:36                         ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-22 12:42                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-22 12:55                             ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-22 13:06                               ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-22 13:15                                 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-22 13:17                                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-22 14:37                                     ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-22 20:53                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-22 17:25                   ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-22 19:17                     ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-23 13:14                       ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-23 17:08                         ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-24  8:52                           ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-24 15:07                             ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-25 12:31                               ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-25 13:25                                 ` Alexander Graf
2011-08-26  4:24                                   ` David Gibson
2011-08-26  9:24                                     ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-28 13:14                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-28 13:56                                         ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-28 14:04                                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-30 16:14                                             ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-22 21:03                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-23 13:18                       ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-23 23:35                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-24  8:53                           ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-22 20:29                   ` aafabbri
2011-08-22 20:49                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-22 21:38                       ` aafabbri
2011-08-22 21:49                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-23  0:52                           ` aafabbri
2011-08-23  6:54                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-23 11:09                               ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-23 17:01                               ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-23 17:33                                 ` Aaron Fabbri
2011-08-23 18:01                                   ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-24  9:10                                   ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-24 21:13                                     ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-25 10:54                                       ` Roedel, Joerg [this message]
2011-08-25 15:38                                         ` Don Dutile
2011-08-25 16:46                                           ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-25 17:20                                         ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-25 18:05                                           ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-26 18:04                                             ` Alex Williamson
2011-08-30 16:13                                               ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-23 11:04                             ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-23 16:54                               ` aafabbri
2011-08-24  9:14                                 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-24  9:33                                   ` David Gibson
2011-08-24 11:03                                     ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-26  4:20                                       ` David Gibson
2011-08-26  9:33                                         ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-08-26 14:07                                           ` Alexander Graf
2011-08-26 15:24                                             ` Joerg Roedel
2011-08-26 15:29                                               ` Alexander Graf
2011-08-26 17:52                                             ` Aaron Fabbri
2011-08-26 19:35                                               ` Chris Wright
2011-08-26 20:17                                                 ` Aaron Fabbri
2011-08-26 21:06                                                   ` Chris Wright
2011-08-30  1:29                                                   ` David Gibson
2011-08-04 10:35   ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110825105402.GB1923@amd.com \
    --to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=aafabbri@cisco.com \
    --cc=aik@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=benve@cisco.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pmac@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).