From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxwb7-0004hE-4P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:49:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxwb5-0005rX-Es for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:49:33 -0400 Received: from eu1sys200aog113.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.135]:37334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxwb5-0005rR-6A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:49:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:48:52 +0200 From: Message-ID: <20110829074852.GB909@gnx2503> References: <20110826141554.GE32250@gnx2503> <20110826142807.GF32250@gnx2503> <20110829072421.GA909@gnx2503> <4E5B43DD.6060505@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E5B43DD.6060505@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression in QEMU user-mode (Was: "tcg: Reload local variables after return from longjmp") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Blue Swirl , Peter Maydell , Riku Voipio , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Jan Kiszka Hi Paolo, On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:46:37AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 08/29/2011 09:24 AM, cedric.vincent@st.com wrote: > >> > > >> > Since you seem to have a nice test case close at hand, could you > >> > please test the fix proposed by Paolo? > > I suppose you are talking about this one: > > > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-08/msg01655.html > > > > This patch can't fix the problem since it isn't related to the user > > mode. > > The patch is only partial, it is the Windows-specific part. Is there a full patch I can test [on Linux]?