From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzIrm-0004a4-KI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 21:48:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzIri-00061M-RI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 21:48:22 -0400 Received: from e23smtp02.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.144]:46885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzIri-00060z-8K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 21:48:18 -0400 Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.246]) by e23smtp02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p821fgpm009959 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:41:42 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p821kdjY647292 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:46:39 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p821m6NM004704 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:48:06 +1000 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:42:33 +1000 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20110902014233.GS11906@yookeroo.fritz.box> References: <1314853263-2086-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <1314853263-2086-11-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <4E5F5B79.10000@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E5F5B79.10000@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/10] intel-hda: Use PCI DMA stub functions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, joerg.roedel@amd.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro, rth@twiddle.net On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:16:25PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 09/01/11 07:01, David Gibson wrote: > >This updates the intel-hda device emulation to use the explicit PCI DMA > >functions, instead of directly calling physical memory access functions. > > There are some calls to {st,ld}l_le_phys() which need conversion > too. Ah, thanks for pointing those out. I'll fold the fix into the next iteration of my patchset. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson