From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Device state visualization reloaded
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:05:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906170529.GA22871@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E664A19.5000207@codemonkey.ws>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:28:09AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 11:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:51:26AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 09/06/2011 10:45 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>On 2011-09-06 16:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>>I'm afraid that won't be enough to stop people
> >>>>scripting this command - libvirt accessed
> >>>>HMP for years.
> >>>>
> >>>>On the other hand, no QMP command means e.g.
> >>>>libvirt users don't get any benefit from this.
> >>>>
> >>>>What I think will solve these problems, for both HMP and QMP,
> >>>>is an explicit 'debug_unstable' or 'debug_unsupported' command that will
> >>>>expose all kind of debugging functionality making it
> >>>>very explicit that it's an unsupported debugging utility.
> >>>>
> >>>>Proposed syntax:
> >>>>
> >>>>debug_unstable<subcommand> <options>
> >>>>
> >>>>Example:
> >>>>
> >>>>debug_unstable device_show -all
> >>>
> >>>For HMP, this would needlessly complicate the user interface, nothing I
> >>>would support. People scripting things on top of HMP are generally doing
> >>>this on their own risk and cannot expect output stability.
> >>>
> >>>device_show is like info qtree: the output will naturally change as the
> >>>emulated hardware evolves, information is added/removed, or we simply
> >>>improve the layout. Recent changes on info network are an example for
> >>>the latter.
> >>
> >>Yeah, I'm not worried about stability. HMP commands that aren't
> >>exposed as QMP commands are inherently unstable and should not be
> >>scripted to.
> >
> >They are also not accessible when using libvirt, right?
>
> $ virsh human-monitor-passthrough GuestName device_show foo
>
> Should work.
So how, in the end, will user know it's unsupported?
I don't agree with 'all HMP is unstable' as people
will use it and will come to depend on it.
What I'm asking is something like 'enable_unsupported_commands',
which will expose all kind of stuff.
Could also be extra stuff in existing commands too -
e.g. info pci is a natural way to see config space
for devices.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-06 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-26 14:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Device state visualization reloaded Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] monitor: return length of printed string via monitor_[v]printf Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] Add base64 encoder/decoder Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 15:21 ` Peter Maydell
2011-08-26 15:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 15:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 18:02 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-02 17:22 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-09-05 13:55 ` [Qemu-devel] required glib version? " Gerd Hoffmann
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] QMP: Reserve namespace for complex object classes Jan Kiszka
2011-09-02 17:23 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-09-02 17:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-02 18:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] QMP: Add QBuffer Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 18:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 " Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] monitor: Add basic device state visualization Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] qdev: Generate IDs for anonymous devices Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 19:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-29 20:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 21:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-31 18:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 9:50 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-09-07 10:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 10:34 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-09-07 10:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 19:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Device state visualization reloaded Anthony Liguori
2011-08-29 20:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-02 17:27 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-09-06 14:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06 15:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06 15:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-06 16:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06 16:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-06 16:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06 16:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06 16:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-06 17:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-09-07 9:37 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-09-07 13:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-07 13:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 13:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-07 13:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-07 13:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 13:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06 16:29 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110906170529.GA22871@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).