From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R20oF-0005yL-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:07:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R20o8-0004pI-DO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:07:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R20o8-0004oq-6S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:07:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 10:07:44 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20110909100744.334efd3a@doriath> In-Reply-To: <1314902275-5240-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> References: <1314902275-5240-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/6]: block: Add I/O status support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, armbru@redhat.com On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:37:49 -0300 Luiz Capitulino wrote: > This series adds support to the block layer to keep track of devices' > I/O status. That information is also made available in QMP and HMP. ping? I'll have to rebase it anyway, but I'd like to know if the general approach is acceptable.