qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix subtle integer overflow bug in memory API
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:34:31 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110915023431.GO9025@yookeroo.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E70647D.10408@redhat.com>

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:23:25AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/14/2011 10:02 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >It is quite common to have a MemoryRegion with size of INT64_MAX.
> >When processing alias regions in render_memory_region() it's quite
> >easy to find a case where it will construct a temporary AddrRange with
> >a non-zero start, and size still of INT64_MAX.  When means attempting
> >to compute the end of such a range as start + size will result in
> >signed integer overflow.
> >
> >This integer overflow means that addrrange_intersects() can
> >incorrectly report regions as not intersecting when they do.  For
> >example consider the case of address ranges {0x10000000000,
> >0x7fffffffffffffff} and {0x10010000000, 0x10000000} where the second
> >is in fact included completely in the first.
> 
> Good catch, thanks for digging this out.
> 
> >This patch rearranges addrrange_intersects() to avoid the integer
> >overflow, correcting this behaviour.
> 
> I expect that the bad behaviour can still be triggered, for example
> by pointing aliases towards the end of very large regions.  Not that
> I expect this to occur in practice.

Well.. I'm pretty sure that particular case can no longer be
triggered.  But there may be other integer overflow bugs in this code,
though I didn't spot them at a glance.

> I think we should move towards using __int128 internally.  Is there
> any relevant host which does not support __int128?

Hrm, using a barely supported integer type I'd never previously heard
of seems sub-optimal.  With appropriate care it ought to be possible
to do all the necessary calculations correctly in 64 bits, even if we
need a few explicit "if (a + b) < a" tests in some places.


> Meanwhile, applied to memory/core, and will request a pull shortly.
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-15  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-14  7:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix subtle integer overflow bug in memory API David Gibson
2011-09-14  8:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-14  8:38   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-15  2:34   ` David Gibson [this message]
2011-09-15  2:58     ` David Gibson
2011-09-15  7:28       ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-16  3:16         ` David Gibson
2011-09-15  7:38     ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-15  7:43       ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110915023431.GO9025@yookeroo.fritz.box \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).