qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
To: 陳韋任 <chenwj@iis.sinica.edu.tw>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] The reason behind block linking constraint?
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:47:36 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109260147.37212.jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110924070021.GA18146@cs.nctu.edu.tw>

> > I meant TLB change by e.g. tlb_set_page. If you change single page
> > mapping then all TBs in that page will be gone.
> > This may be the result of e.g. a page swapping, or a task switch.
> 
>   You said "all TBs in that page will be gone". Does it mean QEMU will
> invalidate those TBs by for example, tb_invalidate_phys_page_range? Or
> it just leave those TBs there (without executing them)? Because I don't
> see functions like tb_invalidate_phys_page_range are called after
> tlb_set_page, I am not sure what "gone" actually means.

Well, my explanation sucks. Let's say it other way, more precisely:
- you have two pieces of code in different pages, one of them jumps to the other;
- and you have two TBs, tb1 for the first piece and tb2 for the second;
- and you link them and there's direct jump from tb1 to tb2;
- now you change the mapping of the code page that contains second piece of code;
- after that there's another code (or no code at all) at the place where the second piece of code used to be;
- but the jump to tb2 still remains in tb1.

> > If there's no direct link between TBs then softmmu will be used during
> > the target TB search and softmmu will generate an appropriate guest
> > exception. See cpu_exec -> tb_find_fast -> tb_find_slow ->
> > get_page_addr_code.
> > 
> > But if there is a direct link, then softmmu has no chance to do it.
> 
>   Let me try to describe the flow. Correct me if I am wrong. Assume tb1
> and tb2 belong to different guest pages.
> 
>   If there's NO direct link between tb1 and tb2. After executing tb1,
> the control is transfered back to QEMU (cpu_exec), QEMU then call
> tb_find_fast to find the next TB, i.e., tb2.

Right.

>   I assume that "all TBs in that page will be gone" means QEMU will
> invalidate those TBs.

No, it won't. I had to say "all code in that page will be gone", sorry for the confusion.

> If not, I think tb_find_fast will return tb2 which should not be executed.

It won't either. tb_find_fast searches tb this way:

  tb = env->tb_jmp_cache[tb_jmp_cache_hash_func(pc)];

but 'page mapping change' implies TLB flush, at least for that page.
Both tlb_flush and tlb_flush_page will clear env->tb_jmp_cache and tb_find_fast will have to call tb_find_slow.

> So, tb_find_fast calls tb_find_slow,
> then tb_find_slow calls get_page_addr_code.
> 
>   get_page_addr_code return the guest physical address which
> corresponds to the pc (tb2). It looks up TLB (env1->tlb_table), and
> get a TLB miss since tlb_set_page has changed the mapping. 
> 
>   if (unlikely(env1->tlb_table[mmu_idx][page_index].addr_code !=
>                (addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK))) {
>       ldub_code(addr);
>   }
> 
>   But I am not sure what happen after the TLB miss. You said the
> softmmu will generate a guest exception. Take x86 as an example,
> do you mean the raise_exception_err in tlb_fill?
> 
>   void tlb_fill(target_ulong addr, ...) {
>     ret = cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault(env, addr, is_write, mmu_idx, 1);
>     if (ret) {
>         if (retaddr) {
>             }
>         }
>         raise_exception_err(env->exception_index, env->error_code);
>   }

Exactly. The exception will be raised inside the guest and the guest will execute its page fault handler or whatever.

Thanks.
-- Max

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-25 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-18  6:33 [Qemu-devel] The reason behind block linking constraint? 陳韋任
2011-08-18  9:31 ` Max Filippov
2011-08-18  9:39   ` 陳韋任
2011-08-18 10:04     ` Max Filippov
2011-09-24  7:00       ` 陳韋任
2011-09-25 21:47         ` Max Filippov [this message]
2011-09-26 10:49           ` 陳韋任
2011-09-26 11:41             ` Max Filippov
2011-09-27  2:40               ` 陳韋任
2011-08-20 20:54   ` Rob Landley
2011-09-27  3:13     ` 陳韋任
2011-09-27 13:27       ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201109260147.37212.jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --to=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenwj@iis.sinica.edu.tw \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).