From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Kevin Wolf <mail@kevin-wolf.de>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] e1000: CTRL.RST emulation
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:09:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110927130956.GB11673@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8w70cyPejTc0=2=y1F+V1XPu3QSOwkRQZ+aSxj3FxWMw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:39:17PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 27 September 2011 13:32, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:50:21PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 27 September 2011 12:25, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > e1000 spec says CTRL.RST write should have the same effect
> >> > as bus reset, except that is preserves PCI Config.
> >> > Reset device registers and interrupts.
> >> >
> >> > Fix suggested by Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
> >>
> >> Doesn't this have the same effect as this patch:
> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108673/
> >
> > Right except mine clears the interrupts as well.
>
> I agree that's required, but why doesn't it belong in
> e1000_reset() ?
I think not, because pci core resets interrupts for us.
> Surely a qdev reset ought also to clear
> the output irq signals...
> [Disclaimer: this is fishing for somebody to explain to
> me what the semantics of qdev reset actually are :-)]
AFAIK what happens is that the qdev is only involved
until we get to the pci root. From then on
pci_bus_reset calls pci_device_reset to reset the device.
> > I missed that patch - what happened to it in the end?
>
> I think it just got lost in the shuffle (Anthony L never
> did come back and actually produce a compiler that gave
> a warning on it, so I think that was just a misremembering
> on his part.)
>
> -- PMM
Yes, that just looks strange. So I intend to just stick this
patch in my tree, unless someone NACKs. Then it'll get merged
in due course.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-27 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-27 11:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] e1000: CTRL.RST emulation Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-27 11:50 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-27 12:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-27 12:39 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-27 13:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-09-27 14:30 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110927130956.GB11673@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=dnelson@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=mail@kevin-wolf.de \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).