From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43754)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1R9Kzl-0000vh-SX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:06:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1R9Kzh-0003Qn-TB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:06:05 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57529)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1R9Kzh-0003Qj-Ku
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:06:01 -0400
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:35:40 +0530
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20110929180540.GB21901@amit-x200.redhat.com>
References: <cover.1312370658.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
	<1ab74cea060d776b19857c3babc64d729bbdba5c.1312370658.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
	<20110929160646.GA16909@amit-x200.redhat.com>
	<4E84ADCD.8030005@siemens.com>
	<20110929175037.GA21901@amit-x200.redhat.com>
	<4E84B0AB.1060303@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E84B0AB.1060303@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Delayed IP packets
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Fabien Chouteau <chouteau@adacore.com>

On (Thu) 29 Sep 2011 [19:53:47], Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Can't reproduce, I'm not getting stable hibernation here even without
> >> any network configured.
> > 
> > With virtio devices and the patches applied?  Can you tell me what
> > you're seeing?
> 
> No, I didn't patch my guest. I was using standard IDE with an emulated
> NIC (or without) against a 3.1-rc3 (or so) guest.

Strange, using qemu.git and an F14 guest (2.6.38) using this cmd line:

./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 /guests/f14-suspend.qcow2 -net none -enable-kvm -smp 2

I could successfully hibernate and resume.

> >> Could you check if the recent pull request [1] changes the picture for you?
> > 
> > Thanks, that series fixes the problem.
> 
> Perfect! Right in time. :)

And people say slirp is neglected and unmaintainable :-)

		Amit