From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9LLF-0007v1-Fq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:28:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9LLE-0000eZ-71 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:28:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9LLD-0000eL-VC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:28:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:57:58 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20110929182758.GC21901@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <1ab74cea060d776b19857c3babc64d729bbdba5c.1312370658.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <20110929160646.GA16909@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4E84ADCD.8030005@siemens.com> <20110929175037.GA21901@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4E84B0AB.1060303@siemens.com> <20110929180540.GB21901@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4E84B6BE.4080806@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E84B6BE.4080806@siemens.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Delayed IP packets List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel , Fabien Chouteau On (Thu) 29 Sep 2011 [20:19:42], Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-09-29 20:05, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Thu) 29 Sep 2011 [19:53:47], Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>> Can't reproduce, I'm not getting stable hibernation here even without > >>>> any network configured. > >>> > >>> With virtio devices and the patches applied? Can you tell me what > >>> you're seeing? > >> > >> No, I didn't patch my guest. I was using standard IDE with an emulated > >> NIC (or without) against a 3.1-rc3 (or so) guest. > > > > Strange, using qemu.git and an F14 guest (2.6.38) using this cmd line: > > > > ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 /guests/f14-suspend.qcow2 -net none -enable-kvm -smp 2 > > > > I could successfully hibernate and resume. > > -cpu qemu64,-kvmclock makes it work. Would have to check a different > kernel version to find out if it's a guest kernel or qemu/kvm issue. Aha, yes. I disable kvmclock in my kernels as that has known issues with hibernate. I haven't checked if the 2.6.38 f14 kernel had it disabled, or maybe I didn't hit its problem point soon enough. Amit