From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAdpy-00060S-Pe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 04:25:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAdpx-0000jZ-Pa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 04:25:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]:47525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAdpx-0000jU-LA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 04:25:21 -0400 Received: by wyh22 with SMTP id 22so3323414wyh.4 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 01:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:37:52 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20111003073752.GA31578@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain> References: <20110929232824.7CBA73FC28@buildbot.b1-systems.de> <87pqih2im0.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> <87mxdl2h0c.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mxdl2h0c.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] buildbot failure in qemu on default_x86_64_rhel5 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Cc: gollub@b1-systems.de, lcapitulino@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 03:03:23PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > +#ifndef CONFIG_UTIMENSAT > + /* > + * We support handle fs driver only if all related > + * syscalls are provided by host. > + */ Perhaps a ./configure check should be added to see whether the handle syscalls are supported instead of using CONFIG_UTIMENSAT. Stefan