From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIOOv-0003nB-FO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:33:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIOOu-0002gG-Im for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:33:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIOOu-0002fj-9C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:33:28 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9OHXRTO012817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:33:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:30:41 +0200 From: Alon Levy Message-ID: <20111024173041.GD12513@bow.tlv.redhat.com> References: <1319457739-14562-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <1319457739-14562-6-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <4EA5846B.9080101@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EA5846B.9080101@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] qxl: support async monitor screen dump List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mlureau@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:29:47PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 10/24/11 14:02, Alon Levy wrote: > > Split qxl_spice_update_area_complete from qxl_render_update, use > > SPICE_INTERFACE_QXL_MINOR 2 introduced spice_qxl_update_area_dirty_async > > to retrive the dirty rectangles asyncronously (the previous > > spice_qxl_update_area_async did not accept a dirty rectangles array). > > > > Introduce SpiceAsyncMonitorScreenDump for a screen_dump. > > That one conflicts with the screendump/SDL fixes pushed to the spice.v44 > branch. Have you seen the mail? Had you time to look at the patches? Yes and no. I will. > > cheers, > Gerd >